When Padre Pio said the Blessed Mother would come to Medjugorje

Standaard

It is a known fact that two eminent blesseds (and future saints) of the twentieth-century, Pope John Paul II and Mother Teresa of Calcutta, had a devotion to the apparitions in Medjugorje, reporting to unite themselves in prayer each day with the Madonna of Medjugorje.

It is, however, a lesser known fact that Padre Pio, the great Italian mystic, stigmatic, and saint, also had a connection to the events in Medjugorje. Even though he died years before the apparitions began, Padre Pio made two magnificent prophecies regarding two separate mystical events that would come from Medjugorje: one regarded the apparitions, while the other regarded the weeping statue of the Madonna from Medjugorje that would gain international fame in Civitivecchia, Italy.

In 1994, Don Pablo Martin was the parish priest of Saint Agostino’s Church in the Pantano district of Civitivecchia in Italy, the area where the statue from Medjugorje—later dubbed “the Virgin of Civitivecchia”—would gain international attention. It was Don Pablo who, making a pilgrimage to Medjugorje in September of that year, bought a sixteen-inch, white plaster statue of the Virgin as a souvenir from Medjugorje.

It is interesting to note that, in his spiritual life, Don Pablo had a strong devotion to Padre Pio – even before Saint Pio was officially canonized by John Paul II in 2002. This devotion is noteworthy because Don Pablo credits Padre Pio’s intercession with helping him select that statue from Medjugorje that would weep tears of blood on 14 different occasions.

It was Padre Pio who assured him, according to Don Pablo, that “the most beautiful event of his life” would result for selecting and buying that statue. Randall Sullivan reported this connection, between Padre Pio and the weeping statue from Medjugorje, in this book The Miracle Detective. The fact that Padre Pio had been dead since 1968 made this message—seemingly a spiritual communication—that much more interesting.

Yet, it deserves mention that even when Saint Pio walked the earth and greeted pilgrims in his friary, in San Giovanni Rotondo, he made what is believed to be a prophecy about the coming of the apparitions of the Blessed Virgin Mary to Medjugorje.

In her book A Spark from Heaven, the BBC journalist Mary Craig reports that a few years before the apparitions in Medjugorje began, Padre Pio had told a group of pilgrims who were visiting him from the diocese of Mostar: “The Blessed Virgin Mary will soon be visiting your homeland.”

Medjugorje exists within the Mostar diocese, making Saint Pio’s prophecy that much more remarkable.

Please Like Mystic Post on Facebook – thanks!

Of course, Padre Pio was a saint who was famous for his various spiritual gifts. God had given him incredible graces. He had, among other things, the ability to heal, the ability to read souls in the confessional, the ability to bilocate, the ability to experience visions of Jesus and Mary and his guardian angel, and – apparently – the ability to prophesy. It should, therefore, come as no surprise that the great saint’s connection to Medjugorje, in both prophesying the coming of the Madonna’s apparitions and interceding in Don Pablo’s selection of the Marian statue that would shed tears, is a very plausible reality.

The bishop of Civitavecchia Gerolmo Grillo reported that in 1995, the same year that the statue from Medjugorje began crying tears of blood, Pope John Paul II asked to have the statue brought to the Vatican. When the statue was brought to the Holy See, John Paul II venerated the Madonna with great reverence, praying before the statue and, after his humble prayer, placing a crown on the head of the Virgin – a crown which the pope himself brought for the occasion.

by  Daniel Klimek

 

http://www.mysticpost.com/when-padre-pio-said-the-blessed-mother-would-come-to-medjugorje/

Should a Catholic believe wholly in the Truth of the Church? Or should he exclaim like Pilate: “What is Truth”?

Standaard

… The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that the Church ‘faithfully guards ‘the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints’ She guards the memory of Christ’s words; it is she who from generation to generation hands on the apostles’ confession of faith’ (CCC no. 171). Moreover, the Divine Master left the Apostles a mandate: “The gospel must first be preached to all nations” (Mk 13:10). Therefore, the primordial objective of the Catholic Church’s dialogue with other religions consists of the announcing of the Gospel, and the call to conversion.

However, Jesus declared that those who did not accept his Gospel would be condemned: ‘Go into the whole world and proclaim the gospel to every creature. Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved; whoever does not believe will be condemned’ (Mk 16:15–16). Consequently, he made it clear that the Church should define positions well: those who follow the truth, and those who persist in error. In face of other religions, every Christian has the duty to ‘not be ashamed of your testimony to our Lord’ (2Tim 1:8). The Catechism teaches: “In situations that require witness to the faith, the Christian must profess it without equivocation, after the example of St. Paul before his judges. We must keep ‘a clear conscience toward God and toward men’ (Acts 24:16)” (CCC 2471)

Being faithful to the truth of the Church is not fundamentalism, but integrity in the faith. Interreligious dialogue that does not point toward conversion, but holds the belief that the Church is enriched and purified with other creeds places the truth of the Church in doubt, in the spirit of Pilate: ‘quid est veritas?’ (Jn 18:38). Dialogue which doubts in the one who affirmed ‘I am the way and the truth and the life’ (Jn 14:6) cannot ‘have meaning of love and truth,’ but amounts to sheer relativism. And the Apocalypse is exceedingly severe with relativists: ‘because you are lukewarm, neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth’ (Rev 3:16)

What does the Magisterium pronounce with respect to true interreligious dialogue? Click here:

EN - Denzinger Bergoglio's avatar

When Pilate, with reverential fear, asked Christ about his sovereignty, he answered: ‘You say I am a king. For this I was born and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice’ (Jn 18:37) Was Our Lord perhaps being a fundamentalist in making this affirmation with so much conviction and resolve? Since he is God, made man, the Truth in substance, he could not have acted differently.

View original post 408 woorden meer

Verering van en devotie tot het Heilig Hart van Jezus

Standaard

Welnu, de liefde van Jezus is niet alleen de liefde van een God, die daardoor oneindig is, maar ook de liefde van een absoluut volmaakte Mens. Het Hart van Jezus wordt terecht gebuikt als symbool van zijn Liefde, die tegelijkertijd goddelijk en menselijk is. Door ons zijn Hart te geven; “Ziehier het Hart dat de mensheid zozeer heeft bemind”, geeft Jezus ons tegelijkertijd de Liefde van een vrijgevige Reddende God en de liefde die klopte in zijn mensenhart. In deze concrete en tastbare vorm begrijpen wij de Liefde van God veel beter. Deze Liefde is letterlijk ‘onbe-grijp-elijk’

Beheerder Website's avatarLegioen Kleine Zielen van het Barmhartig Hart van Jezus.

HET HEILIG HART VAN JEZUS

Op 15 mei 1956 publiceerde Paus Pius XII de encycliek over de “Verering van en devotie tot het Heilig Hart“ ter gelegenheid van de honderdste verjaardag van de beslissing van Pius IX om de Mis van het Heilig Hart, die tot dan toe was voorbehouden aan bepaalde bisdommen en religieuze families, uit te breiden tot de universele Kerk.

Dit nieuwe pauselijke document wilde duidelijkheid brengen aan allen die, reeds voor het Tweede Vaticaans Concilie, deze devotie in twijfel trokken en deze niet alleen ontkenden maar zelfs lasterden.

Neen, deze devotie die door verschillende Pausen (waaronder Paus Paulus IV) warm werd aanbevolen, is verre van ouderwets of achterhaald.

Pius XII gaat zelfs zover dat hij de verering van het Heilig Hart ‘dé religieuze daad bij uitstek’ noemt. Door deze verering niet ernstig te nemen, zouden wij ons schuldig maken aan lichtzinnigheid. De Kleine Zielen moeten haar…

View original post 1.742 woorden meer